general

if that is equivelant to the following, yes

unless I did my math wrong

im confuse

nope

not equivalent

wtf am i doing wrong?

trying to use the quadratic formula to find complex roots

completing the square is easier

explain?

wait

I am retarded

trie

forgot to divide the 2 by 2

1 sec

im just confused at this point, like how am i fucking up the quadratic formula

this problem seems too involved for a summer homework

you weren't potato

yes

what you did is correct

My bad

okay

thank fuck

-3?

yes

ok

typo in paint

ok

so much for not using imaginary numbers in calculus

ok

time to eat

You use them a bunch early on

for solving roots, do not do any actual calc with them though

he initially wrote (x+1)^2(x-2)+(x-2)^2)(x+1)=0

I have 4 pages of different math and physics problems between this lad and umbreon NotLikeThis

which is much easier

no complex roots

but the wolfram page changed the second x-2 to x+2

lmao

(x + 1) (x - 2) (2 x - 1)

aka what I said it should include

(x+1)(x-2)(x+1+x-2)

(x+1)(x-2)(2x-1)

logs of negative numbers are definitely a thing because of how complex exponents work

it reduces to ln(|x|) + iπ

Dear lord

It begins

Taking all bets

how long until someone such as sargon gets hit

well youtube is going to die soon

alright

i found a problem that i high key have never even seen before

top one

bad picture

cannot see

but pikachu

k

one sec

somebody might get offended by that video

even though

it has cold

hard

facts

you see pikachu

the truth is offensive

and that is wrong

Using the table of values given above, find the average change for f on the interval (2,5) and write an equation for a secant line passing through the corresponding points

lieing is the only way

that we can be unoffensive

average the difference of each change

2, 7, 1, 5, 2, -5

12/2 = 6

im sorry if I am cutting you off potahto, I am just pissed off and ranting after a forced diversity assembly

x: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 f(x): -10 -8 -1 0 5 7 2

Do not know about the -5