general
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
is nisovin no illusin
Why bother doing a theory on Starcraft 2's plot. It's bad and full of holes. Blizzard has said they put what looks cool way before the story
Don't care
Also game theory is bad, but that's not the point here.
Honestly, we'd probably become more like the Protoss than Zerg. Not what the Protoss become in sc2. No the arrogant about how much better they are, asshole High Templar Protoss.
They also had a hive mind
I know, that's the joke
Skynet
Amon was basically diablo
Amons hole plot arc was basically the same as diablos
Also I only culturally appropriated the native americans color because someone took my white privilege
I am
"Wow"
From what I've seen. A lot of those game theory's have similar problems
Like most franchises these days, gotta milk it for dat $
ehhhhh
The Legend of Zelda: Tri Force Heroes Part 1 - Three For the Price of Four
We team up with Tom Fawkes and Josh Jepson to stand on top of each other and throw each other off cliffs. Oh, and to co-operate, or something... Tom's Channe...
youtu.beYeah
Shadows of mordor isn't bad, but it's another tower climbing game with the nemesis thing
At least it wasn't an ubisoft tower climbing game
Everything ubisoft must have towers
its law
again, I didn't say it was bad. If it was done by ubisoft, it probably would have been
Ubisoft and EA really like fighting for worst game publisher
When was the last time EA published a good game?
