>holmes: "being that as of the mythological tradition, he would be a king amongst gods, he is in the original sense of the phrase an existence most proximate to a ruler of the planet"
>mash: "ergo, something like skadi or arjuna?"
da vinci: "based on the combat data we recorded of artemis and poseidon, we can decisively state otherwise. in the case of arjuna, the divinities (神性) did with the dwindling of faith likewise decline, but this isn't the case with these machine gods"
da vinci: "from the very basis of their existence do they bear the functionality of gods. the theos klironomia are the proof of this"
>holmes: "in the antiquity, the poet Aeschylus did once refer to zeus as such: the omnipotent, omniscient god of justice"
>gordorf: "what do you mean omnipotent!? isn't he just a sly pervert that randomly turns humans and animals into constellations?"
