the-dump

bopit, in context that can only really be interpreted that way

I am willing to give you the benifit of the doubt, and say you did not mean to make that arguement

pretty sure that is another one

but you did

another what

fallacy

WHAT

FUCKING

FALLACY

lel

Jesus christ man

well

idk

seems like one at least

you do not understand fallacies

since you have already falsely accused me of several

you know what fallacy I can correctly accuse you of though

the fallacy fallacy

you are just shit at arguments

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

but uh

you sayign that that can only be interpreted in one way

one reasonable way

maybe I am wrong, give me an equally reasonable interpretation

then

I will post this again so that you have the exact word chocie and conversation in mind when you do

you lovers

Pika x Bopit

shit pika

Marriage quarrels

yoiu think we can keep going for another hour?

yes

bopit, I will dedicate the next 4 hours to dunking on you if I need to

oh god

really, this seems like its starting to die down for me

mother and father are still fighting

I'm losing interest pika

because you are being proven wrong

this is more like watching my siblings fight, rusp

no

equally retarded

losing ground*

you are just being too stubborn

Bopit

not one thing you have presented has held up to scrutany

wait

what

Again, if you present a good arguement I will admit I am wrong

but you have yet to

you mean

your biased scruitny?

porygon and max's biased scrutiny?

im never biased

huh

bopit is right because we are all clearly biased

got it

i mean

it is not as if bopit can be wrong after all

he's not wrong

we're biased to some degree

no I'm just saying you havn't disproved any of them

I absolutely have

but

I did not tell you to fuck off, disproven

/r 6d20

@Rusp: 6d20 = (2+2+19+10+18+20) = 71

you REALLY havn't

the red herring was your own red herring, not mine

disproven

/r d20

@taxes: d20 = (3) = 3

but

it wasn't

it was

/r 6d20

@Deleted User: 6d20 = (9+13+1+12+7+9) = 51

that's the thing