the-dump

@Rusp: 6d20 = (20+9+16+8+19+6) = 78

did

you told me it was dumb

*tell

i wasn't going to make 6-15 decide whether i was gonna block them

which is what I did to these roll bois

Yeah, okay

and

how does that make me a hypocrite

you could have retorted when I called league dumb saying I was incapable of understanding how to play because I am a casual gamer

it is called banter

because you implied criticism with your statement?

I

WAS

MAKING

FUN

OF

YOU

I am not criticizing shit

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I don't care what the fuck you play

go ahead and play whatever the fuck you want

and I don't care wht the fuck these bois do

Yeah, so we are in agreement everything posted was just banter

yeah pretty much

so your evidence for me being a hypocrite is wrong

and I am not

still a hippobobippocrit tho Kappa :noKappa:

maybe if I argue with you enough you will learn how to structure an arguement without bringing up useless shit then getting confused when I start talking about the shit you brought up

maybe if I argue with you enough you will stop throwing a fallacy into every argument

Name a single fallacy I used

red herring

when

and the one where you change someones argument

you changed it first

uh

no I didn't

if anything, you red herring'd yourself

oh boy

here we go again

I didn't

you just change the argument

you do this a lot you know

yeah, I totally brought that up

totally me

my username is ripob in this picture btw

you are the one who started arguing about it

BECAUSE

YOU RETARD

YOU BROUGHT IT INTO THE ARGUEMENT

pika

I just didn't want to scroll up

and copy

paste

the text

calm

the

fuck

You can't accuse me of red herring you for something you want to talk about

down

you brought it up, you put it into the discussion

so not a red herring

try again

name another fallacy

wait yes a red herring

and as I said

yeah, you red herring'd yourself

the one where you change my argument

which you did

to red herring

I guess

you changed the arguement by giving me an example I needed to counter

that was not a different arguement btw

it was a sub arguement

that was relevant to the main arguement

sub argument

red herring