like gabs huge anti porn crusade a month back
spam
seal.mp4<:vinny:631324820386349077><:vinny:631324820386349077><:vinny:631324820386349077>
Jump to date
Sunday, January 12, 2020
That is such a stupid hill to die on
that was not his arguement
he wanted it all gone and people put on lists
If people wanna be gay they can be gay but they should leave everyone else alone instead of parading around their pride
and kids parents should stop being retards then gent
and actually do their job
Drug dealers get arrested
or shot by other blacks
porn is not drugs
gent, you know how cancerous that would be
almost everything does
its almost like human brains release drugs as a response to stimulii
>turns you farther left
>thinking being far right is any better
wait
how does porn make you go farther left
I also saw what the right used to do
Dialga, the right wing is against porn now
I don't get it either
and what the right is going to do once they are in power culturally again
that's where the coomer meme came from
It really is a strange hill to die on
let the degenerates watch their porn if they want to. if they need help they can get it themselves
a bunch of right wingers believe a new age of porn censoring is coming and they will usher it in
I'm surprised the right wing, is trying to censor free speech
I am not
The right hates it just as much as the left
Censorship of any kind is bad
but because the left controls free speech at the moment the right has been fighting for free speech as of late
it will flip the second the right controls it
is illegal because it harms children
exploitation of children is illegal
you know what does not harm children and should not be illegal, lolicon
has no baring on speech
advocate for it all you want
preventing the eploitation of children is different than censorship gent
is it criminal slander? Sue them,
also loli art is fine yes
if not, then they can say what they want
sue them, damage of reputation has remodies
I don't get how libel and slander laws, get lumped into free speech arguments
No, it wouldn't be gent. you would be defending yourself from a false narrative
if you can prove malicious intent
you can sue
because anti free speech people are retards
Neither of those examples were any good though gent
that one annoys me bopit
and here is why
proving that speech intends to do harm, is a hard bar to satisfy
