banned-users

i guess, but i dont see why that should be an issue?

Because they come across silly

people associate certain names with certain prejudices

God I hate reading studies

yeah, which is bad, is it not fire?

did i say it wasn't?

true

I mean, prejudice or postjudice

People form these opinions for real reasons, you can't assume all discrimination is wrong

An asian man is more likely to eat my dog than a white man

It’s just the truth

Not when we send the west into a famine, boy

With your fucking beetles

You're the one who made wolf jerky

sorry, was afk what names are ok to discriminate against I personally think some names are retarded

I was black

can I think less of someone because they have a retarded name?

Yes spooky

The black names that are very dumb

And have apostrophes and shit

I'm still trying to see what names they used

well why do you think that the name is retarded?

I've met a "kumquata" irl

Elon musk son name

named after a kumquat

Make fun of that too

They just change the spelling of normal names, in a lot of cases

Daquarese

my last name is dumb, and I make fun of it myself

Terrible name

and hell, my last name is ethnic

whats your last name spooky

ethnic

is his last name

i mean, isnt that how we got our names, just bastardizations of other things?

damn

thats so shit

Yeah but our names are good

Logan is a great name

my name is a bastardizaton of james, which is a bastardization of jacob

Blacks have their own subset of the english language

"good" is subjective

Ebonics

No, good is objective

Like art

I don't think good is subjective

Good isn’t subjective dumbass I’m always right

Morality is objective

oh great we're back to this again

YES!

I think good can be a generic as "phonetically/linguistically elquent" and not absurdly uncommon for the era you're being named in

I LOVE THIS CONVERSATION!

I agree with spooky though

If your name is hard to pronounce it’s a shit name

how does one pronounce logan

Log-on

Low gan

Log in

I don't think someone named Thurmand in 1800 is a bad name, but someone named thurmand in 2020 is a bad name

Gan as in ganondorf

im getting mixed messages here

even so, a name being shit is no reason to treat them any differently

treat them for their actions, not for what they are

what

It’s actually lowgin

well yes, "good" can be morally objective depending on certain things, but i think that the reasoning that rusp used the word "good" was not the same

i cant bully max for another reason now

im pissed

Max is a boy name

Bully her

It can come down to picking applicants with names you associate with good things

I don't think that's "morally" anything

I think a name, by its stated purpose

should be pronouncable and common

I thin that's the point

of th ethings we call ourselves

in our society

but then where does individuality go?