you fucker
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Thursday, June 11, 2020
ope
leg asked me a physics question here
not my fault
Also leg I thought about it, I don't think relativity would allow for that
and if it does, uncertainty would not
What is they do
Event horizon dawn
Hey @Spooky Phijkchu, What's the name of your imaginary friend
Robert Moran?
or do you mean like as a kid
as a kid
they didn't really have a name, or if they did I forget it
more like a ghost
hmm interesting
>Cool now I have to use my phone to check my email at my computer
transfer to a better school
My school just redid their login page
Well done
Already broke the dang thing
my school basically does that too pika
mine is basically everything but my email though
And yup, we pretty much require 2fa as well
@RyanGirdusky @ColumbiaBugle So then these are the "Rs" that were silent: Roger Wicker (MS) Deb Fischer (NE) Mike Rounds (SD) Joni Ernst (IA) Thom Tillis (NC) Dan Sullivan (AK) David Perdue (GA) Kevin Cramer (ND) Martha McSally (AZ) Rick Scott (FL) Marsha Blackburn (TN) Sup...
Democrats clamor together behind Warren with the plan to remove all federal buildings named after confederates, GOP utterly fails to take a stand against them at all, more of them take their side if anything
wait, what are they planning on doing? changing the names of the buildings?
Yeah, mgiht of phrased that weirdly
ah, and that is a bad thing why?
Because some of these buildings have centuries of legacy to their name, and it's completely unreasonable to scrub these names from history because of overly-sensitive faggots of today
If you look at the history of many of these confederate monuments, they were approved of by the union because there is (or was) a sense of respect between them
i mean, i see your point of the fact that it is history, and i am a sucker for history, but i can understand the other side that the names are literally the names of enemies of the country, some of which were promoting slavery and such. I am totally okay with maybe having put somewhere that they used to be named their previous names, maybe like a section of the building with a little history shrine or something.
i agree that history shouldn't just be wiped out
And there's your problem connor
When you start going along with the thinking of "they supported things we consider nasty now so I can understand the other side" what american historical figures are safe?
Every president up until JFK (and even he had some strange opinions about hitler) would be considered a horrible bigot today
i guess so, but i guess that goes into the direction of "wElL iT wAs JuSt A dIffeRnT tImE", which as dumb as a statement it kinda is, there is some truth to it
The confederates back then had more in common with the union than either side has in common with modern america
hey a fellow libleft is finally here lol
He's been here
ive been here
im just usually silent
a fellow libleft is here at the same time that i’m on*!
lol
I’m just always gone, my bad lol
i mean, same tbh 😛
libtards
Half the time you'd be on their side
Your opinions flip every week
destroying cultural symbols such as statues is against the geneva convention
And let's just be blunt about it, many people in the confederacy, whether leading or following, were good and admirable people
also, when were these building even named? would you really consider it to be legacy/history if these were even named after the civil war and such? like in the early 1920s and such
yes conour
who cares about the geneva conventions
Hahaa
why is that a question
I think geneva convention stuff is a meme
If they were named today they should still be defended
it’s just more pointless government telling us what to do
If it's something not even built yet, just named, it should still be defended
but kowtowing to the whim of a mob is a dumb rationale for doing anything
How dare you insult democracy!
so many people don’t realize that the civil was was much more than slavery
So that's how you spell "kowtow" huh
it was mainly about slavery.
lol
apparently
Not even close
I was thinking cow-toe at first
there was such a divide between the north and south
Conour, honest question
what caused the American civil war of 1861
I'll concede it was mainly about slavery if you concede the Democrats were and always have been the party of slavery
The whole slavery narrative is extremely tiring
And fuck off mr "dems are the real racists"
i had to write my final for college history on what caused the civil war
didnt the platforms of the parties switch in the 1960s?
