banned-users

Gg

They have to pretend that this climate problem is going to have imminent consequences

50 years ago they were saying it was imminent too

Consequences of more food being grown

The amount of arable land we have isn't really the biggest issue though- We produce enough food to feed the world, it's just the matter of how much of it is wasted

We need to focus on our own country first

We already give billions in foreign aid to "developing" countries

And billions to our military

The fact is that charity can only accomplish so much, especially when you don't have your own country straight

Which, I'm totally down to have a huge military because I think china is a threat in the future

Yeah, good

But I feel like there's a certain extent to where its unnecessary for it to actually be that big

Research and develop mass nuclear power systems and the climate is saved (except the global temperature is largely controlled by the sun’s surface temperature so it wont actually make any difference)

Let’s just all globalize guys

Lol what

That will help 😄

One earth nation

Make it happen

I'm just really confused as to leg's statement because I've never even heard of that idea before

Well yeah, nuclear energy is really efficient

I mean the second half

"global temperature is controlled by sun's surface temp"

And looking it up, it seems to be "the rate of change is so slight we won't notice anything even over many millennia, let alone a single human lifetime."

I don't know or care much about the warming cooling cycle theory

The fact is we have no reason to put the enviornment before the survival of our own country

I don't think it's a mutually exclusive thing though

And I'm trying to find something that shows more than just the industrial revolution, leg so give me a sec

America's power won't last forever at this rate, and politics are soon going to swing hard to the side of globalization

My stance is: *Climate models have never once predicted accurately *We should do nuclear anyway *Warming is better for humanity regardless

The only reason democrats politicians latch so hard onto climate change propaganda is because it breaks american identity

Stop worrying about yourself, worry about those people over there

Meanwhile, you get run out of your own neighborhoods by migrant gangs and your children get hooked on pills

America is in a very delicate position as is

Its also the party of the poor keeping people poor like they are incentivized to do by over taxing and regulating

I like how lamp comes back and it is a political arguement

lol

hey lamp

welcome back

hey pika

supprisingly no

Good job gent

I am impressed

Up yours

yeah it was me, i didn't realize yall weren't lefties

just wait until i talk about how healthcare for all would make it so the average person spends less on healthcare

I am a filthy centrist

gent is alt right

I’m racist

Hey Rusp, to be fair, it was Gent who brought up migrant gangs

Leg is a magapede

I’m against races because I don’t have legs

My opinion on bernie is as follows, after 2016 he proved he is weak willed and willing to submit to the democrats to buy another new house

so no one should take him seriously

biden is also bad

trump is okay but not great

All correct

thanks that is my canadian look on american politics

I hate trump for his retarded boomer takes

like muh video games cause shootings

Oh leg I finally found up to date graphs on the temperature and solar activity thing

where the solar activity goes down and the temperature still goes up?

Leg, is the argument that I don't tend to take the conservative side on

Don't exactly buy that the industrial revolution and the standardization of gasoline usage is (((just a coincidence)))

And honestly if you look at the yearly average,

I agree with the fact that china and india are the main problems for pollution

and we should all move to nuclear

america can go 100% green and it will barely do anything because of china and india

it looks like the solar irradiance is actually kinda linked to it each year, but it doesn't have such a drastic effect overall

Those arent graphing the same data but sure

But I'm not gonna want to fuck over my own country just to take the moral high ground on environmentalism

Both our own energy and China/India can be solved with nuclear energy

>letting china have nuclear

lol

I’m implying we nuke them

On all the stuff I was looking at, it seemed like people agreed that solar irradiance was the more important measure

Keep drilling for oil, tesla and whoever else can do their research on the side, but it's not economically viable for the rest of us

nuke china, turn india into the cheap sweatshop country

it already is