i dont think so
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Tuesday, March 3, 2020
i dont think they have electoral votes at least
big shocker here Trump won Texas
and Colorado
he payed for a top political official to endorse him in america samoa
so thats the main reason why he won im pretty sure
he does that everywhere
true
once we get the democrat nominee can we just skip the debates
skip the presidential debates and just elect early
if its biden as the nominee
get it out the way
then honestly just dont have a GE
its trump 100%
its trump 100% of whos left
not for bernie imo
lets be honest its really down to biden and bernie
neither of which appeal to moderates
both sides hate Bernie conor
the media hates bernie
Bernie is only popular amongst broke college kids
the republicans keep promoting bernie because they want a split democrat vote
who dont pay taxes to begin with so his healthcare tax raises mean jack
the majority of people are noticing great financial stability and growth from the Trump regime so going for something as stupid as bernie's plan is something they will avoid
Bernie is popular because he has an actual ideology to sell
No other candidate has a vision
Beating Trump is a vision Kappa
albeit a retarded one
Bloomberg has said he is a fan of Trump's policies so he is literally running just to one up Trump
hes legit just "liberal" trump
Trump, but anti-gun
Trump is debatably pro-gun
He's soft on it, but he's still going with the party decision at the end of the day
lmao
not even liberal
bloomberg is literally a conservative republican
trying to buy the election
Conservative economically only, so not conservative at all
conservatives don't tend to make large drinks illegal afaik
what would that be then
pretentious asshole
>large
Anything over 16 ounces
that bans the 2 dollar soda bottles in gas stations because those are 16.9
Disincentivizing sodas through deregulation falls more in line with conservative, if that's the desired outcome
The moral police seem to swap parties every couple decades
Moral police as in what? Using the government to enforce morality?
Playing to a base that wants to see government regulation shape population habits
Christians wanted to see the government regulate the shit out of media for a while
It should, really
Now young liberals want to see the government restrict consumer choice
choice in what way to get fucked over the least Pog
Your ideology is toothless if you're not enforcing morality
It always backfires though Gent
Oh really
There's enforcing the wrong morality, or enforcing it in an asinine way
LGB acceptance rose, due to being ignored more than anything
But if you just decide to stand back and let be, what can you possibly stand FOR?
rather than some top-down push for equality
the number of swear words in a song, or the size of a cup at 7-11
shouldn't be "moral" issues
there's a better word for it
They are, even if they're bad ones
but when your idelogy seeks to force itself down the throats of your electorate
I wouldn't want vulgar songs broadcasted on children's tv channels
it will always end poorly
The market will shake that out though
you don't need federal protections
Oh I'm sure it never works out ever
Look at the entire history of civilization and proclaim that they were all fools for daring to enforce things
enforcing morality?
yes, throughout all of history
it's never not been foolish
It is the most inefficient way to get what you want
This isn't the natural state of man, spooky
Everyone doing what they want with impunity, even excluding murder and rape and the like, will just reduce civilization to tatters
You need to decide there are freedoms that will be restricted
That's a cop-out answer though
"everything is morality"