metapod
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Sunday, October 21, 2018
there was one lmao
There was one
but thats dead
so its coming back
And no, your loli is still harmful
as the shiny metapod
kappa
Sure thing gent
Not letting that shit slide
it's not gent
We’re reviving it in 2024
It normalizes it
What is the lowest amount of money yall will suck a dick for
no it doesn;t
It's not even real gent
And gta normalizes car theift
10 usd
females dont get to answer
https://i.imgur.com/fOO29Ps.png
You can say that all you want, but that doesn't hold up
An essay
Here we go again with this loli debate oof
Hey pika
pika
Regardless though, loli could actually be destroying the west, but I still think banning it is a bad choice
yes max
Of course you do
https://i.imgur.com/T2i6SLi.png
I feel like stealing a car and looking at loli is not 100% comparable
does that count as backtalk
kappa
Nihilism
Or hedonism
ban gent
banning hasn't ever gotten rid of anything
not really
It's fair debate though?
it got rid of bopit
usually just makes people want it more
It got rid of karp
I am also against banning furry shit, I think that is degenerate as all fuck
Banning art is retarded
its still questioning/backtalking pika
which means he should be banned
kappa
The problem is
Loli looks like kids
my videos of little girls are "art"
So you can say you like it because it’s art
But I meaannaaana
>also against
Well fuck
I'm blind
wall fuck
Never said it
Pika doesn't want to ban any form of art, thinking the idea of that is dumb
pictures of 12 year old girls is art
this is a good way to kill time for sunday funday
therefore it should not be banned
Okay, let me clarify.
I'm of the idea that all censorship is bad
Skribble is the best way to kill time
my torture sculptures are art
ill make a room rusp
All ideas (art is an idea under my definition), should be explored in the least damaging way possible
I actually have my laptop now
Oh boy
Do you want to limit what kinds of art can be shown to children?
loli explores the idea (in this case child sex) in the least damaging way possible
Or on public access?
that is up to the parents
Parental choice
they should monitor what their kids do
Really
The least damaging way would be talking about it’s existence
So they can just decide to completely fuck up their heads and you wouldn't want any state interference