The goal is, when the CDC wants to do research on
---Fetus developemental studies
They don't want every pro/anti abortion group weighing in and blowing their $10k research expense out of the water
They don't need it to become an issue they have to spend weeks explaining to the press and their chain of command
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Saturday, December 16, 2017
can't they just avoid saying that instead of banning it then
The goal is for the expense report to look like
---Research expense 000F1
---Research expense 000F2
---Research expense 000F3
---Project expense 000G1
That's also a bad thing, though, since it heavily reduces transparency in the budget
That's the point though, the CDC should not be answering to public opinion on every decision they make
I disagree. Transparency in a governing body is one of the most important things.
And also, what makes you think they would stop anything just based on public pressure?
The FCC has shown that that clearly doesn't matter.
lol, that's a whole different issue entirely
Public opinion matters on issues people care about
It's why the story is being written on these 7 words specifically
Both life/choice and net neutrality are issues people care about
The story is being written on all seven of the words
No "specifically" about it
Nobody, N O B O D Y
gives a shit about net neutrality
It's a trendy issue on the internet, that's it
THE INTERNET IS GOING TO BE LITERAL HELL BECAUSE SUPPLY AND DEMAND AREN'T A THING
Net neutrality is an issue comparable to the life/choice debate
I whatever circles you're in, sure
no i'd say the life choice is actually a somewhat worthy debate topic
Not doubting that in the least
That's fair, I'm basing my claims on anecdotal evidence.
What about you?
Leg, I meant in terms of scale only.
I do agree with you, but that's a separate matter.
before you guys rip eachother up some more keep in mind that there's not much you can do to change whatever happens anyway
lol, I'll keep that in mind
Rip each other up? I thought we were having a good natured discussion.
Got to remember I can't do shit
might have been good natured
but to me it just kinda seemed like two people clearly knowing what sides they were on
saying what they planned on saying from the start
I think it is good natured
I mean, I guess? We're defending our opinions.
That's pretty normal
yeah it's all good 'till you have too much rum and start a mutiny
Eh, I don't drink
questionable but decent
I do, I'll drink enough for both of us Black Mage
Anyway, it's been fun, Spooky
You raised a point I didn't think of
I shouldn't assume the worst
I mean, you're welcome to
I think we disagree on the transparency thing
Though I think your view is just a bit more pure than mine is, I like transparency too
transparency is nice but not always useful
I mostly just dislike articles like this, which are not addressing the root cause of why something is being changed, and focusing too much on what is changing
It does say that the representative didn't tell them any reason behind the changes.
Leaks in general annoy me, because often it feels like they're just trying to feel important or impress people with what they know
But then again whistleblowers are important
so idk, America's a mess right now
It's up to all you kids to fix it
Or burn it down
it's not like foreign enemies are a big problem at least
I do hope we don't have to resort to burning it down
That sounds messy
things would honestly be better if we had pirates around again, then the population would be less focused on petty political gains and more focused on not becoming davey jones' plunder.
imagine the glorious unity, for you guys at least.
I've been to Somalia, was pretty shit, would not recomend
Kind of shoots down your pirate idea
those pirates are frauds
can't even sail a true ship
if it's not made of wood then it's not a real pirate in my eyes
same goes for the "space" pirates
Looks like a ship to me
I mean at least they're trying I'll give them that much
Well, that's a picture of them surrendering to Russia
lmao
better than surrending to the dutch
but seriously what did they expect
they don't have a single cannon or mast on that poor raft
of course they woulld fall victim to the navy
But they've got two engines
All the speed
what's an engine?
A replacement for all those slaves rowing
