Kappa⁴ Archive

banned-users

Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>

Jump to date
Pins
taxes banned-users
"(Parent lures child with candy, kid comes over and then touches parent's face. That's perfectly fine based on society, parents do it all the time. Yet it's inappropriate if instead of the face, the child touches the dick instead. There should not be a difference just because the latter case is 'sexual', nobody was harmed, everyone had fun.)"
taxes banned-users
"Adult takes out dick. Child nods with adult interpreting as that approval. Adult sticks it in, hurts the child, child screams, pubic parts permanently destroyed, traumatised for life. Not true consent, that I’d consider rape and adult should be punished. Adult takes out dick, child once again shows consent. Adult sticks it in, child enjoys it. This interaction is perfectly fine and should be allowed. Adult takes out dick, child shows consent, they have sex. Both enjoyed it, nobody was harmed. 10 years later child forgets the incident but later Mother reminds child that yes you did have sex at like 5 years old. 15 year old child is absolutely shocked, wants to charge the adult for rape. Well the adult should not be charged for raped because the child consented and enjoyed it at that time. So though child regrets decision at 5, adult did not rape."

This archive is read-only — captured July 2020

Channels:
Density:

Jump to date