banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Monday, November 13, 2017
This case was 2001
i m a g i n a r y h u m a n s
It was tried in 2013/2014
Loli won
Just go into horses tbh
Could look up that case but not sure about the case name
I am still going to watch it tbh
Buckly V Valeo
As long as it's not based on a real child it should be legal
lmao nah thats money is freespeech in america get bamboozled
I have no sexual attraction to children, I just really fucking hate oversized breasts in my hentai
which basically limits me to lolis
since it is one or the other for the most part
More often than not hentai has shit writing and visuals anyways
define oversized
pika doesnt like anything that isnt flat Kappa
C cup at most
Hentai is fucking hilarious shut your mouth loveland
you just do not watch the good stuff
so like 28AA?
i watch hentai for the Plot my dude
I agree with the first statement and disagree with the second
I watch pornhub like youtube vidoes
Hentai is for the plot
i wanna know if the plumber fixes the sink or not
Pinned a message.
Kappa
remember played it for the plot? hah feelsbadman
1 line in
already gold
good pin leg spicy
Leg did you go back 5 months just for that?
the reason that the Applicant did not initially think that anything was “seriously
wrong” at customs, was because both CBSA Officers continually referred to the
animated Japanese style images on his computer as being “borderline”.I love paid mods.
wtf is this
stop pulling up all the bullshit i did not say
i scrolled up to when you first joined
That's dirtier than the smut your wrote yesterday Max
just have a bunch of these pinned kek
The case you posted seems to be more an issue of how the guy was handled
and not the loliporn
in other news: battlefront 2 took one from rob
That's his complaint, not the trial case
it gives credits based on time played not skill
Battlefront 2
will look for the supreme court case then
Another franchise EA ruins
1 sec
It goes back and forth for a while, judge throws it out because the characters are not real people
No trial, no precedent set sadly
nah i still think ittl do fine
then it does not matter
supreme court already ruled that childporn applies to imaginary humans
so it is illegal
children are imaginary?
I wish
Children don't Exist
The interpretation by this judge was that a loli depiction of a real kid would be illegal
but some generic loli would not be
Simulating a real person using computer aided imagery
That's what I was saying earlier
Bro judge is bro
Many hollywood actresess are coming out and accusing Tom Hanks of being too nice.
Too nice jokingly or too nice creepy
was a meme so neither
Onion article i believe
Ah, good
you know how they wanted to change Americas 20 dollar bill from Jackson to Harriet tubman?
guess that just brings us back to using black people as currency
In October 2012, after being reported August 2011 by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography"Fuck wives
Ended up being charged because the lolis were committing incest, not because they were 11
fyi if anyone is looking for a wife
I don't report loli lovers
that's not a trap
