banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Jump to date
Thursday, October 6, 2016
very interesting
but
I would have tried a centrifuge
$500 / 3 people
But I couldn't get a lab
make a potato battery and pocket the rest Kappa
Pay someone 10 bucks to beat up a guy with a potato battery, steal it from him while he is down
pocket the rest
gues what game is on sale after i've complained about it never being on sale
I have barely been on the computer for non-school related things for the past week
xenoverse
fuck
I was going to guess that lol
I should get 2
1 was good
i want to play the first one first because your character is relevant to the second one
Is it on sale for less than 96 cents canadian
$12.49 USD
how do you show a piecewise function does not have a derivative at a certain value?
I need to give my character the best moves when i transfer him
no clue what piecewise is
the limit going to it from each direction is different
I got you
that is what that is
yeah, what leg said
but its giving me the same answer...
Sadly i won't have xenoverse 2 till christmas
then it exists
and the question asks you to show that it is different
the limit of the derivate
the derivative is a limit
wait
if the slope going in and out is the same, its continuous
so take the limit of a limit?
the question says that it is 100% not continuous
can you give the equation?
what is the function
also it does not have to be continuous for it to have the same slope
could have a removable or point discontinuity
if you want to be teachnical
give us the function you dip
no shit
you got me jonsen for some function pron
f(x) = x^3 for all x </= 1, 3x for all x>1
</= is less than or equal to
however you are supposed to denote that
rip code block
I get 3 for both derivatives
3x^2 for first
3 for second
double derivative
where x=1 btw
so it would be 3 for both
6!=1
textbook is wrong
under what circumstance does 6!=1?
maybe its supposed to be x=0?
when 1=0 because....
x = 0 is defined
in this world
a-b = 0
can't divide by zero
the old screw the rules proof rules
I know
yeah I think the textbook is actually wrong
because it would make sense if it was x=0
no it wouldn't
0 =/= 3
maybe I am suposed to use tthe calculattor for this
piecewise functions mean only one piece is evaluated at each part
Kappa
thats extremely easy
I know the asymptote is at -3/4
it is
how the fuck do I prove it
