what were you implying?
banned-users
Phi Kappa Chi ΦΚΧ <a:yeah:589703000977571860><a:ppHop:536353159615086612>
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
then choose a side
yes
and argue for it
space side
so ignore the rest of the sources?
that dont help me
use as many as you can
I have to use 3 minimum
use all 12 or whatever to get a better score
i think
http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/chiefreadercomments_51458.pdf
but they contradict my arguemnt...
counter argument
wait so do or dont counter arguemnt?
do one, you have to show all sides of the debate
this guy is arguing that our destruction of earth will happen in spcae
he is also a flat earther Kappa
Thursday, April 21, 2016
not really
oh hey
use ad hominem to invalidate his opinion
oh shit
thats mean
I like it
don't actually do that
I know
its a logical fallacy
I was thinking of arguing that his essay has a logical fallacy
OH SHIT
THERE IS ONE
there usually are
so he is claiming that what happened on earth will happen in space
what fallacy is that?
slippery slope?
i have no idea
rip
could be red herring
maybe nott
it seems like a bunch
possibly faulty analogy
space is not that similar to earth so it can not be argued that space has property x
non -sequitar
I think it is mostly faulty analogy
because he is comparing space to earth
but space is not like earth
this guy...
hang on I will get the link
fuck
wrong link
thats an audio file
yeah
its in the audio stuff
http://invisibleheart.com/funding-space-travel/
derp
fuck this guy
and fuck his voice
because I can make fun of it
the document goes up to leave money on earth
holy shit
I wish this was in the document
he is saying that private institutions can do space stuff
they wont get enough moneys
look what we are doing with space now
nothing
because no taxpayer money is being put into it
fuck this guy
thanks obama
obama in disguise
I could still debunk him
does nasa take donations by any chance?
like could people give them money freely to do space exploration?
"spreading infetions via space"