Search archive

Kribbles can rejoice, he can finally see new episodes of the smoking show

not bad honestly

So you are saying is, high end 200k and everyone here gets a phd

that includes that rule

I don't see it in #rules

what rule

they'll do it regardless

They want the state to recognize it for tax reasons

Legal req

No, your child is based if they can pull that

and the post was either at my own expense or at tiny's depending on how you interpret it anyways!

I don't think gent would time me out for that because that would just cause an argument

I didn't know you can

You are welcome

is your kid the type to have a romantic or sexual harem, also to answer another question preemptively, if they are the head or just a member also depends on what kind of hypothetical kid you think you have

depends on what you think your hypothetical kid would go for

the harem master has at least 3 people in the harem, harem in the traditional use case of either a romantic or sexual group for one person

I presume

or mentally unfit to make decisions themself

They are under age

I'll wait for the gameboy port

Referring to fire as heir, actual CEO larp

to argue we should be allowed to be an accredited research intitute

I think within 2 years, we will have enough PhDs among us

it was the rent for that week

Also fire I payed your salary

We are a non profit

True

You can just do that

lol

but I agree with spooky that you should do it if you have stuff

I don't have one because technically speaking, I have functionally zero net worth and it would make zero sense to bother

There are a lot of reasons, that spooky would be better at explaining

Yes tiny, you can be biased in the 3rd direction

real answer is certainly more in the middle

I think I am biased too far in one direction, and I think you are probably biased too far in the other extreme because of the place you live/people you are around

I think if anything my university friends are doing better than them

I was moreso thinking family, friends of family, etc

so maybe my bias is in the opposite direction

I personally don't know anyone below 65 who has a net worth above 100k excluding house and car

Which you should remove boomers, because they skew every single statistic like this

Also I think if you remove all people above 65 from the list, along with houses, the percentage becomes vanishingly small for net worth above 100k

most peoples net worth is going to be their house

I think most people who have 100k net worth are not talking to a financial advisor, 250k maybe, but I think if you changed it from net worth to "money you have, not including housing/car/etc" then the percent might become most people

with the percentage skewing higher the higher your net worth is

I would guess its probably like, 1% of people with 100k+ new worth spooky

you should, but I doubt most people are doing that

I would suspect, in fact, that only a minority of people do that

I do not think everyone earning above minimum wage sets up a personal LLC spooky

rest of the world would have still done gay marriage probably