That's the entire premise of that movie
Search archive
You should watch Arrival
Have you seen and do you like Arrival Leg?
being scared, witty, smart, etc. all at the same time is sorta exhausting for the viewer
without spoiling anything, since I still think most people here would find it worth watching Proj Hail Mary
I don't think you can write a main character who needs to be 10 different characters at once, and gloss over the internal conflict
but yes, definitely more introspective and technical in writing
I don't like his books at all, I really thought I would when I first read the Martian
ik for some people they're some of their favorites
even if you let the MC talk to himself a lot
I really like the Martian (movie not book), I feel like Proj Hail Mary is trying to tell a character story that's sorta impossible to adapt
https://cunnyx.com/kaynimatic/status/2073370632721703076
They're including all the best sideplots too
this is the episode I thought they were going to include a long time ago
MT is so fucking good
And Max
Happy Birthday America
I think phones misreport their actual charge state a lot of the time
and ended up as the head of fucking Fifa
even if I fence sat on a lot of them
good find
this is a more fun political compass quiz than usual
collective vs stateist
Kribbles
I don't know what Davos vs Dubai is supposed to mean
I didn't think of that
How the fuck did I get the soccer guy
AX built diff
This is a WAY better stage than Anime North
https://cunnyx.com/DistantValhalla/status/2073218225689768340
idk if that makes sense
then it would mean #1 is correct, I just can't think of a statement that works like that
it's usually the speaker, but I guess if you constructed a self-proving sentence, and abstracted the speaker from it
I still think there's a ghost-subject (it has a linguistic term idk) that is party to the statement
and if you sub in to "____ will happen tomorrow"
I guess, what is something that can be "guaranteed" without a speaker/perspective being added
I feel like one is required to use the word, even if you don't specify who is doing the guaranteeing
I feel like we all sorta agree
but what is the opposite position
I can go back and read
yeah, there were some grandma types who still taught
K-6?
they were as retarded as we all were
it's still crazy to me, looking back, that all K-6 teachers are in their early-mid twenties, or were grannies
that she had no power to guarentee either, which made them not
and I think I actually had this same argument
my 3rd grade teacher btw, her first example of a probability 1.0 statment was that bees like flowers, and when I told her that's stupid she backtracked to "the sun will rise tomorrow" which I also took issue with
I feel like it has to be possessive, maybe I'm not thinking of a scenario where it isn't
if something has been guaranteed, it has to be guaranteed by someone
but, I still think a guarentee is based on the speaker
my wording on the ice cream clauses was bad
it's the same statement I think