nintendo

"this doesn't need to be a full-priced game"

it's part of the reason subscription services are catching on imo

(despite me hating them)

I absolutely hate GAAS for pretty much everything besides MMOs.

it's less games-as-a-service

Oh, sorry, I misunderstood

live-service

or whatever

You mean like, the Xbox Game Pass thing?

and more the subcription packages like UPlay+ or GamePass

yeah

I think it's smart

even if I dislike it

it's hard to make a game that's worth $60+ but it's not hard to make a lot of games that are worth staying subscribed for $10/month

For me, that's more like, giving a place to rent games after rentals died and PC games stopped having demos without having to torrent

see

i fucking hate nintendo

ill say it time and time again

you called it first Max

ds games had more content than most modern switch games

appak

and they were

FUCKING

35 dollars

sometimes 25

EXPLORERS OF SKY was 30 DOLLARS

I've never seen a physical DS game released at less than $30, but the point does stand

yes

and now you have switch games

that are 60

automatically

because LOL ITS SWITCH

stuff like MArio Golf

or Mario Tenis

being $60

is disgusting

some wii games were bad

they should have made mario sports

just combined all those games

for full price

but Switch is on another level

also lmao I wish games were 60 dollars

I'd much rather pay $60 for Mario Golf or Mario Tennis than $60 for Pokemon Sword/Shield, $30 for the two expansions, however much it is for Pokemon Home to be able to transfer shit, etc

paying 90 with tax is pain

the problem is like

its actually

way less effort too

3d models take 1/1000th the effort

spritework takes

But I view money differently than other people, it seems