banned-users

Because theyd have people willing to pay for something

See, the question at the root of this is what do people WANT from rabbit

what are the three features you must have

video

chat

work

how important is the switching though?

?

switching who controls

passing the remote

Ok

oh

Even if

kinda

You made a rough version

That didnt run on rabbit but you could switch who was sharing a browser tab

Thatd be fine

>last actual phijkchu movie night on rabbit was fucking total drama

I never understood

we should of left it at wall e

See, I like and I don't like that part of it, I like the low barrier to entry, and the fact that anyone can do it but I don't like that it lacks the same abilities I'd get if I was just streaming something locally to Twitch or whatever

Why rabbit had servers for hosting and didnt just tab share

That would have saved so much money

I think there's a tech reason there Reggie

Max, I want this guy to do a blog, or podcast, or videos, or something

I need to know what was in his mind

Well they tried

To make it social media

At the end

they tried a lot of things

I always figured

but I need to know, what the vision had evolved into

Their changes were attempts at being aquired by someone

Just because they couldnt afford to run the site

Which actually seems very plausible

rabbit felt like

something old google would do/make

they did Max

Google Spaces

did they?

see

I'm always right

more for sharing audio/music

but iirc, they did video too

interesting

Google Spaces was an app for group discussions and messaging developed by Google. The app was intended to compete with Slack as a content sharing platform where users can create a "space", invite their friends for discussion, and share videos, images, text, and other media.

it was trying to do too much

Slack